- Created by Bart De Pelsmaeker (Unlicensed) , last modified by Vicki McEwen on Feb 10, 2024
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current View Page History
« Previous Version 12 Next »
Business Solution Background
PMF Info (This is pre-BMC, pre-PRD work)
Sort intro
Comprehensive Compliance Coverage
State agencies must adhere to a wide array of regulations across different domains. A common unmet need is a centralized solution that can map and manage all the diverse compliance requirements a state agency needs to adhere to efficiently.
Up-to-date Regulatory Information
Regulations frequently change. State agencies need a tool that provides real-time updates on regulatory changes to ensure continuous compliance, pains & gains that our solution could alleviate.
Why do they have to solve these now? Reason-to-act?
TBD
Is this problem at scale or local/trivial?
TBD
Pains:
Resource Intensiveness: Manual compliance processes are often time-consuming and require substantial manpower, diverting resources from other critical tasks.
Risk of Non-compliance: The complexity and evolving nature of regulations pose a constant risk of non-compliance, which can result in significant penalties and reputational damage.
Information Overload: Sifting through vast amounts of regulatory information to identify relevant requirements is overwhelming and prone to errors.
Lack of Expertise: Limited access to compliance expertise can make navigating regulatory landscapes challenging, especially for less common or new regulations.
Gains:
Efficiency and Cost Savings: Automating compliance processes can significantly reduce the time and resources required for compliance management, leading to cost savings.
Risk Mitigation: Real-time updates and proactive compliance management help mitigate the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties.
Enhanced Compliance Oversight: A centralized dashboard for tracking compliance status across various regulations enhances oversight and decision-making capabilities.
Improved Regulatory Insight: Access to expert analysis and interpretations of regulations can improve understanding and compliance strategies.
Reputation in the industry for part of the unmet needs
We are known in the compliance industry for compliance mapping
Proven expertise in mapping
Existing references across industry
Leverage of partners / GTM with strong existing presence in target market
Our solution will be encapsulated in a larger offering from ServiceNow, which has strong presence in the market:
about 40 of 50 states are a ServiceNow customer
Do we know how many agencies?
20-30% of states are TemplarShield customers
Why would we not be well positioned?
We do not have an existing footprint
We do not have direct access to the end-customers
Key capabilities to best address the unmet need
(high-level bullets, this is not PRD phase)
Regulatory updates (real- or near-time)
Requirement Identification (Documents and mandates within documents)
Requirement comparison, consolidation, and differentiation
Common controls mapping (customizable) specific to state agencies
Customization and scalability: allow for unique compliance requirement needs
Integration capabilities: GRCs,… (maybe one ?)
More:
Audit questions
@sonny - How do we envision delivery? Are there online marketplaces or so that we have to get the content pack on? Or customers comes to our site and signs up?
What is defensibly unique about the need <> capability set?
*Requirement comparison, consolidation, and differentiation via common controls mapping
Concrete examples:
eg Atlanta agencies or others. We need some real lists and real systems that they integrate with:
Do we have validation of the needs?
Beyond internal conversations, discussions with partners and friends.
Industry stats
e.g. research reports, general industry numbers,…
Customer discovery interviews
Actual target customers, face-to-face
Total Addressable Market (TAM)
The whole universe of state agencies who experience this need.
The average number of agencies per state is 150. Which more or less would bring us to 7,500 potential customers in this initiative.
Serviceable Available Market (SAM)
The part of this market that we can realistically reach and convert in a medium- to long-term.
If we assume that we can close 2% of that business that is 3 deals per state. Not accounting for a price increase that is 3 agencies x 50 states = 150 CCH Accounts. 150 accounts x $10,000 = $1.5M annually
Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
What can we realistically capture of this market in 18-24 months after solution launch? What are our beach-heads? Taking into account our
Competitive advantage
Current market penetration of competitors
Our marketing and sales' need for time to reach the customers in (pre-)buying mode
These bits of info might help us to get clarity
when are states renewing the contracts - EOY or throughout the year
no set date - dates are unique to customer
are these multi-year contracts
mix - ServiceNow leaning to 3-yr contracts
which ServiceNow contracts are how many are up for renewal this year
ramp-up: when we have the mapping ready, what are our next steps in sales
proposal decision cycle: how long
30 -60 days on average
is there a testing period from partner side
no
Marketing channels
Which ones and why are they the best to reach this SOM?
Strategic partnerships
This initiative is intended to leverage the TemplarShield - ServiceNow partnership relations.
GSA listing?
Getting listed on the General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule
Content marketing / though leadership
Develop and share insightful content that addresses the specific compliance challenges faced by state agencies. This could include white papers, case studies, blog posts, and webinars
Industry shows
Are there specific shows where our customers could be reached
Budget
Do we have funds to spend on marketing?
Estimate for CAC in this market
Sales execution
How would we follow-up on deals/get informed?
Value & pricing
Do we offer identical pricing as for other customers (eg enterprises)? Or do we tailor the pricing: limited capability, lower price (likely higher quantity) or higher pricing? And if so, why?
Our solution is part of larger compliance deals that ServiceNow delivers to the state agencies.
We currently decided to move forward with our standard pricing.
Model
What model best fits state agencies? Any specific requirements?
Do we need clearance to sell to some agencies, etc
No clearance needed at State level, clearance would be at federal level
Next steps
BMC Canvas
ICP definition
PRD
- No labels