Page Comparison

Form related

Ability for potential contributors to go the UC HubSpot website page and choose an option to fill out Federated Data license.

The form is a gated HubSpot form so that only authenticated users can fill it out.

Ability for potential contributors to fill out the Federated Data license with information specific to their organization.

Note that the form is already built by the marketing team within HubSpot.

Ability to automatically email the license to the user once the form has been completed.

Part of the HubSpot workflow

Ability to store the form in HubSpot to the organization, once the form is filled out.

Is the form attached to the company, CCH account, UC 4.0 workspace, or other? See Amanda. We already have many filled out.

Ability to update the HubSpot contact intent to reflect that they have filled out the Federated Data license.

Part of the HubSpot workflow

Ability for the UC 4.0 product to have access to the Federated Data license.

Ability for authorized users of the workspace to view the license.

Anyone besides admins? Yes, everyone. This is a license, just like any other, that needs to be viewable by anyone using the content the license applies to.

Dorian Cougias the question here was for users within a workspace (let’s say AT&T), could Reader-type AT&T users be able to view AT&T’s own license agreement directly? that is, not attached to any document, but just to be able to read the agreement.

Ability to require the customer to fill out the form prior to contributing content.

For customers that do not intend share, there is no need to fill out the Federated Data license.

Could be a link to the same website form and once filled out would be attached this workspace.

General terms / EULA

Ability for each user (contributor or not) be able to confirm they have read the terms (aka EULA)

Ability to require each user (contributor or not) to re-confirm they have read the terms (aka EULA) if/when the EULA has been updated.

Ability for an end user to view the current terms at any time.

License and Attribution

Ability to automatically attach the license to any content that is shared with the community.

Includes any existing content such as PlantUML and glossaries and sets framework for any future content type that would be added later.

Ability to automatically assign attribution for content sourced from content contributors.

Includes dictionaries (e.g., OED, MW …) or other content providers like PCI, GRI …

Ability to automatically assign attribution for any content created within the platform.

Example, if an AT&T user creates a PlantUML diagram, AT&T is attributed to the creation of that diagram.

Ability to automatically assign attribution for any content enriched within the platform.

Example, if an ACME user maps in a PCI authority document, each enrichment task (e.g., tagging terms, matching to common controls) is attributed to ACME.

Dorian Cougias since we don’t yet have enrichment on UC 4.0, this is not needed at this time. Correct?

Ability for users to manually assign attribution (could be multiple) to content created (or later updated) within the platform.

Example, if an AT&T user creates a PlantUML diagram, but used sources from two other company’s websites, the user must be able to site both sources by name and source URL.

Ability for users to copy shared content and make changes while keeping the attribution chain.

Example, if an ACME user copies and modifies an OED attributed dictionary term-definition pair, the copied term-definition pair will indicate that OED was the original source and ACME attributed to the updates.

Ability for any user to see the attribution chain within the user interface and within API results.

Example, if an ACME user copies and modifies an OED attributed dictionary term-definition pair, the attribution chain will show that OED was the original source and was modified by ACME.

Ability for any user to see (through the UI and API response) the license associated with each attributable source per shared content.

Example: if a PlantUML diagram was originally created by AT&T, then copied and modified by IBM, any user can see the attribution chain (in the UI and API response), but also see the licenses from both AT&T and IBM.

Example: if an ACME user maps in a PCI authority document, each enrichment task (e.g., tagging terms, matching to common controls) is attributed to ACME. End-users are able to see attribution to PCI as the authority source and ACME as the content enrichment provider including links to licenses for both PCI and ACME.

Ability for any user to view and download their organization’s license (e.g. PDF) to share with legal, compliance, or other teams.

Dorian Cougias this was suggested by the product team. Seems like we ought to include this to ensure license can be shared with non-user legal, compliance or other teams.