...
We get an idea by looking at which browser tabs are open when Mapping is being done.
The current project/document +
Research - a couple of tabs open
Dictionary
The source regulations, possibly in different versions
Previous document with mappings, in-depth reports
The Magic spreadsheet
...
The system (?auto - ?how) matches a sentence to a Common Control.
So this tries to do it for us. It's I don't know. This search doesn't tend to work for me.
I really never look at those results because I think because of what I mentioned, because it's not searching the right things.
...
A tool that helps with human verification of the match between Requirement/Citation and Common Control is the simple word match visualization:
...
During the Tagging process (3x/2)
Dictionary stuff would have come up. Let me think. When I was actually inputting tagging.
when I am in the matching phase, I don't really consult the dictionary
When the tagger searches for words.
Eg to compare the words ‘patch panel’ and ‘network cabinet’ - will look up their definitions.
...
You know, you you might think it's one thing and then, in fact, it's the other thing when you see the exact definition and resources and what actually means.
| Info |
|---|
...
Deeper definition matching |
...
happens because we are not industry experts, we are generalists. |
...
Or when the system tells us there is no definition and we should add one to our dictionary.
This is doesn't exist in the dictionary. So I'm gonna create a new dictionary task
So 1 way I use the dictionary is when I'm creating terms, which isn't isn't a whole lot
(note about 10 times in 5-6 months)
Using external sources
After going to research, and if nothing is there - go to Google
then is this a nonstandard term of existing term? And so here is where I need to go out and do some research for what this term means.
what I would do is go out and the world and search for both And then pull up a reliable dictionary.
And then I would try to find a way to merge these into a single definition that makes sense.
But ChatGPT seems to work well too:
I'll go into chat chat GPT and say, could you merge these into a dictionary definition, and and it does a very good job of that too.
What is important in the Dictionary?
...
How do you use Relationships in the Dictionary?
...
...
| Info |
|---|
Note that these relationships seem to show only our past documents - not referring to a larger underlying corpus. |
For example, there was let's see. So, previously, there's a control about processing domains, and we were trying to decide whether and how it relates to server And so when I look at processing domain, just by looking at the definition, it's just saying distinct areas like a of computer processing within a server software application or system. And then I look at the immediate relations I didn't see anything that was directly related to okay. So it is directly related to server.
...
it's evidence that can be shown to a customer that our conclusions on his citation are in fact valid.
Other people don’t use it.
No.
(for general terms) this thing is huge.
for terms where it could be helpful, it's it's pretty bare just because it's like, the less relatable, I guess, the term is the fewer relationships it's gonna have.
They only look at this because the task asks that they add to the diagram.
go through this process and adding the definitions. But, really, that's the only time I would look at this.
| Info |
|---|
Keanu had to do a search to highlight the terms he actually wanted to see in the graph (see below). |
| Info |
|---|
The view is not really perceived as effective |
...
"In those cases where we're dealing with particular particularly skeptical or demanding subject matter experts when things like all of the evidence available in the dictionary and even in the asset tables anywhere we could find in our resources in these recitations, everything here, it becomes you know, I mean, that's basically darsenal, and we have to take information from there and turn it into digestible information or just bullet points from which we can argue the validity of our choice."’
his was our original match, and they weren't satisfied with that. So this is AT and T notes, kind of explaining the purpose of the citation, what it's actually saying.
Re the Assets
I feel like all of these element tables don't know how much people really even search here, but, you know, mappers enter all of this information.
...