Page Comparison

Organizations

Reference to the GRCschema definition => GRCschema - Organization

Ability to create and setup a new Organization with all required information as identified in the standardized account definition

As customer or partner of UC I want to create a new organization so that I can start the process of onboarding new users

Includes: legal name, name, description, domain, phone number, email address, founded year, phone number, address, social address, and classifications (e.g., NAICS Code, SIC Code …)

Ability to update an existing Organization for all relevant information identified in the standardized account definition

As a customer or partner of UC I want to update the organization I created to ensure the information is correct

Same as above

Ability to upload and change the Organization logo

As a customer or partner of UC I want to customize the look and feel of my organization by updating the log so that it feels like home

Ability to delete an Organization

As a customer or partner of UC I want delete an organization I created by mistake and start over so that I don’t get confused as to which organization is the right one

If users can’t delete on their own, it is fine if UC deletes on their behalf

Accounts

Reference to the GRCschema definition => GRCschema - Account

along with

GRCschema - Group

GRCschema - Team

GRCschema - Initiative

Ability to create and setup a new Account with all required information as identified in the standardized account definition

Includes: name, phone number, and address

Ability to update an existing Account for all relevant information identified in the standardized account definition

Ability to upload and change the Account logo

Ability to delete an Account

If users can’t delete on their own, it is fine if UC deletes on their behalf

Ability to invite additional users to an account

Ability to deactivate users assigned to an account

Ability to delete users from an account

If users can’t delete on their own, it is fine if UC deletes on their behalf

Ability to create, update, and delete Groups and add/remove users to those Groups

Ability to create, update, and delete Teams and add/remove users to those Teams

Ability to create, update, and delete Initiatives and add/remove users to those Initiatives

Users / Persons

Reference to the GRCschema definition => GRCschema - User and GRCschema - Person

Ability to register as a new user with all required information as identified in the standardized account definition

Includes all the basic user information defined on the User object includes first name, last name, middle name, and e-mail address

Ability to register a user as a Contributor by supplying additional trust information

Includes how to contribute as (org, person, or both), two social addresses, and phone number.

Ability to supply additional optional information to help further identify the user

Includes alternative names, aliases, additional email addresses, additional phone numbers, additional social addresses, postal addresses,

Contribution Managment and API Protection

There needs to be a workflow in place to manage who can contribute, what they can contribute, and guardrails if broken to revoke rights

Ability for UC to allow or revoke rights for an account to approve own users for contribution

As a UC Administrator I want to allow or revoke the ability of an account to determine who can contribute to the federated database so that UC can control the quality of the federated database

It could become burdensome on UC to do all the approving. Initially we can keep it simple where UC must always approve. In later releases, we introduce the toggle to allow customers to decide who on their teams can contribute

Ability for an Account administrator to request that a user be allowed to contribute

As a UC Administrator I want to allow or revoke the ability of any user to contribute to the federated database so that UC can control who can contribute

If UC doesn’t allow an account to decide on their own, then there must be a request process

Ability for an Account administrator to revoke or allow users to publish to the federated database

As an account Administrator I want to allow or revoke the ability of a user to contribute to the federated database so that I can control who on my team can contribute

If we allow an account, then account administrators should be in control. Some users will only be researchers and not need to contribute

Ability for UC to revoke or allow users to publish to the federated database

As a UC Administrator I want to allow or revoke the ability of any user to contribute to the federated database so that UC can control who can contribute

Even if allow accounts or third-party application to control who on their team can contribute, UC must be able to revoke the rights of a bad actor

Role Based Access Control

Not everyone can be an admin

There are two areas we need to control:

1. permissions to perform functions like delete users

2. control contribution workflows

The first is an obvious candidate for RBAC. But controlling contribution workflows initially “feels” like a set of toggles with a bit more meaning that purely a permission.

Ability for UC to create, update, and delete a set of default / global roles

Ability for UC to turn on / off permissions within global roles

Ability for UC to add new permissions and include them in default roles

Ability for UC to designate which role is assigned to the initial user of an organization

Ability for UC to designate which role is assigned to subsequent users in an organization

Ability for account administrators to create, update, and delete a set of custom roles

Ability for account administrators to turn on / off permissions within custom roles

Ability for account administrators to assign roles to users

Ability for account administrator to determine which role is automatically assigned to new users

Both the API gateway and the Mapper 2.0 application need RBAC. How can standardize on one implementation in two different products with two different tech stacks?